Angola vs North Africa: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Angola
- North Africa
How they compare
Angola currently reports 10.08 current US$ against 2.35 current US$ in North Africa, a difference of 7.73 current US$.
That makes Angola's figure about 4.3 times North Africa's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Angola has been ahead every year.
Angola ranks 8th and North Africa ranks 6th of 51 countries.
Angola has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Angola | North Africa | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.71 current US$ | 2.94 current US$ | 23.77 current US$ | Angola |
| 2000s | 11.15 current US$ | 2.41 current US$ | 8.74 current US$ | Angola |
| 2010s | 9.94 current US$ | 2.35 current US$ | 7.59 current US$ | Angola |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Angola or North Africa?
- Angola, at 10.08 current US$ against 2.35 current US$ in North Africa as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Angola and North Africa?
- 7.73 current US$, with Angola ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Angola and North Africa?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1997 to 2011.
- How do Angola and North Africa rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Angola ranks 8th and North Africa ranks 6th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.