Botswana vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria: Residential monthly telephone subscription

Botswana
12.28 current US$
in 2011
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria
5.72 current US$
in 2011
Botswana rank
7th
Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria rank
4th

Residential monthly telephone subscription over time

  • Botswana
  • Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria
24681012199020002011

How they compare

Botswana currently reports 12.28 current US$ against 5.72 current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria, a difference of 6.56 current US$.

That makes Botswana's figure about 2.1 times Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria's.

The two have swapped places 3 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria ahead.

Botswana ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria ranks 4th of 51 countries.

Botswana has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Botswana Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria Difference Ahead
1990s 4.75 current US$ 4.16 current US$ 0.5959 current US$ Botswana
2000s 6.31 current US$ 4.94 current US$ 1.37 current US$ Botswana
2010s 12.32 current US$ 5.64 current US$ 6.69 current US$ Botswana

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Botswana or Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria?
Botswana, at 12.28 current US$ against 5.72 current US$ in Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria as of 2011.
What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Botswana and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria?
6.56 current US$, with Botswana ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Botswana and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria?
20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
How do Botswana and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
Botswana ranks 7th and Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria ranks 4th of 51 countries.
Where does this data come from?
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Botswana vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria: Residential monthly telephone subscription. Statizoid, drawing on International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates. Retrieved 14 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/residential-monthly-telephone-subscription-current-us/botswana/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa-and-nigeria/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/residential-monthly-telephone-subscription-current-us/botswana/sub-saharan-africa-excluding-south-africa-and-nigeria/">Botswana vs Sub-Saharan Africa excluding South Africa and Nigeria: Residential monthly telephone subscription</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$)
Unit
current US$
Source
International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (World Bank Open Data)
Coverage
57 places, 1,080 data points, 1982–2011
Last refreshed

Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.