Burkina Faso vs Chad: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Burkina Faso
- Chad
How they compare
Burkina Faso currently reports 6.25 current US$ against 6.06 current US$ in Chad, a difference of 0.19 current US$.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Chad has been ahead every year.
Burkina Faso ranks 20th and Chad ranks 21st of 51 countries.
Chad has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burkina Faso | Chad | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4.1 current US$ | 8.85 current US$ | 4.76 current US$ | Chad |
| 2000s | 5.79 current US$ | 6.17 current US$ | 0.3812 current US$ | Chad |
| 2010s | 5.96 current US$ | 6.06 current US$ | 0.101 current US$ | Chad |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Burkina Faso or Chad?
- Burkina Faso, at 6.25 current US$ against 6.06 current US$ in Chad as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Burkina Faso and Chad?
- 0.19 current US$, with Burkina Faso ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burkina Faso and Chad?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1993 to 2010.
- How do Burkina Faso and Chad rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Burkina Faso ranks 20th and Chad ranks 21st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.