Burundi vs Guinea: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Burundi
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 1.03 current US$ against 0.8293 current US$ in Burundi, a difference of 0.2007 current US$.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.2 times Burundi's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 18 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 49th and Guinea ranks 48th of 51 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.67 current US$ | 3.3 current US$ | 1.63 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.4437 current US$ | 2.52 current US$ | 2.08 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.8293 current US$ | 1.03 current US$ | 0.201 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Burundi or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 1.03 current US$ against 0.8293 current US$ in Burundi as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Burundi and Guinea?
- 0.2007 current US$, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Guinea?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Burundi and Guinea rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Burundi ranks 49th and Guinea ranks 48th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.