Cabo Verde vs Djibouti: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Cabo Verde
- Djibouti
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 5.63 current US$ against 4.95 current US$ in Cabo Verde, a difference of 0.68 current US$.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Cabo Verde's.
Across all 21 years both countries report, Djibouti has been ahead every year.
Cabo Verde ranks 28th and Djibouti ranks 25th of 51 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cabo Verde | Djibouti | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 3.03 current US$ | 19.69 current US$ | 16.66 current US$ | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 2.91 current US$ | 9.85 current US$ | 6.94 current US$ | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 4.83 current US$ | 5.63 current US$ | 0.7969 current US$ | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Cabo Verde or Djibouti?
- Djibouti, at 5.63 current US$ against 4.95 current US$ in Cabo Verde as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Cabo Verde and Djibouti?
- 0.68 current US$, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cabo Verde and Djibouti?
- 21 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Cabo Verde and Djibouti rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Cabo Verde ranks 28th and Djibouti ranks 25th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.