Cape Verde vs Equatorial Guinea: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Cape Verde
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Equatorial Guinea currently reports 5.42 current US$ against 4.95 current US$ in Cape Verde, a difference of 0.47 current US$.
That makes Equatorial Guinea's figure about 1.1 times Cape Verde's.
Across all 7 years both countries report, Equatorial Guinea has been ahead every year.
Cape Verde ranks 28th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th of 51 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Cape Verde or Equatorial Guinea?
- Equatorial Guinea, at 5.42 current US$ against 4.95 current US$ in Cape Verde as of 1998.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.47 current US$, with Equatorial Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1998.
- How do Cape Verde and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Cape Verde ranks 28th and Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.