Cape Verde vs Sudan: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Cape Verde
- Sudan
How they compare
Cape Verde currently reports 4.95 current US$ against 4.87 current US$ in Sudan, a difference of 0.08 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Sudan ahead.
Cape Verde ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 31st of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Cape Verde averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Cape Verde | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.93 current US$ | 11.22 current US$ | 8.3 current US$ | Sudan |
| 2000s | 2.84 current US$ | 2.49 current US$ | 0.3507 current US$ | Cape Verde |
| 2010s | 4.83 current US$ | 4.61 current US$ | 0.2245 current US$ | Cape Verde |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Cape Verde or Sudan?
- Cape Verde, at 4.95 current US$ against 4.87 current US$ in Sudan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Cape Verde and Sudan?
- 0.08 current US$, with Cape Verde ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Cape Verde and Sudan?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Cape Verde and Sudan rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Cape Verde ranks 28th and Sudan ranks 31st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.