Central African Republic vs Equatorial Guinea: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Central African Republic
- Equatorial Guinea
How they compare
Central African Republic currently reports 5.82 current US$ against 5.42 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea, a difference of 0.4 current US$.
That makes Central African Republic's figure about 1.1 times Equatorial Guinea's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Equatorial Guinea ahead.
Central African Republic ranks 23rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th of 51 countries.
Equatorial Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Central African Republic or Equatorial Guinea?
- Central African Republic, at 5.82 current US$ against 5.42 current US$ in Equatorial Guinea as of 2009.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 0.4 current US$, with Central African Republic ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 1998.
- How do Central African Republic and Equatorial Guinea rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Central African Republic ranks 23rd and Equatorial Guinea ranks 26th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.