Comoros vs Lesotho: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Comoros
- Lesotho
How they compare
Lesotho currently reports 6.83 current US$ against 6.36 current US$ in Comoros, a difference of 0.47 current US$.
That makes Lesotho's figure about 1.1 times Comoros's.
The two have swapped places 7 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Comoros ahead.
Comoros ranks 19th and Lesotho ranks 16th of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Comoros averaged higher in 1 and Lesotho in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Comoros | Lesotho | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.86 current US$ | 4.96 current US$ | 0.8967 current US$ | Comoros |
| 2000s | 5.42 current US$ | 6.18 current US$ | 0.7613 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 6.06 current US$ | 6.83 current US$ | 0.7725 current US$ | Lesotho |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Comoros or Lesotho?
- Lesotho, at 6.83 current US$ against 6.36 current US$ in Comoros as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Comoros and Lesotho?
- 0.47 current US$, with Lesotho ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Comoros and Lesotho?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2010.
- How do Comoros and Lesotho rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Comoros ranks 19th and Lesotho ranks 16th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.