Côte d'Ivoire vs Gabon: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Côte d'Ivoire
- Gabon
How they compare
Gabon currently reports 31.62 current US$ against 15 current US$ in Côte d'Ivoire, a difference of 16.62 current US$.
That makes Gabon's figure about 2.1 times Côte d'Ivoire's.
Across all 18 years both countries report, Gabon has been ahead every year.
Côte d'Ivoire ranks 4th and Gabon ranks 1st of 51 countries.
Gabon has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Côte d'Ivoire | Gabon | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 8.19 current US$ | 19.37 current US$ | 11.18 current US$ | Gabon |
| 2000s | 9.83 current US$ | 17.74 current US$ | 7.92 current US$ | Gabon |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Côte d'Ivoire or Gabon?
- Gabon, at 31.62 current US$ against 15 current US$ in Côte d'Ivoire as of 2008.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Côte d'Ivoire and Gabon?
- 16.62 current US$, with Gabon ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Côte d'Ivoire and Gabon?
- 18 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2008.
- How do Côte d'Ivoire and Gabon rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Côte d'Ivoire ranks 4th and Gabon ranks 1st of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.