Djibouti vs Senegal: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Djibouti
- Senegal
How they compare
Djibouti currently reports 5.63 current US$ against 5.12 current US$ in Senegal, a difference of 0.51 current US$.
That makes Djibouti's figure about 1.1 times Senegal's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1992 it was Djibouti ahead.
Djibouti ranks 25th and Senegal ranks 27th of 51 countries.
Djibouti has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Djibouti | Senegal | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 19.69 current US$ | 4.9 current US$ | 14.79 current US$ | Djibouti |
| 2000s | 9.85 current US$ | 4.83 current US$ | 5.02 current US$ | Djibouti |
| 2010s | 5.63 current US$ | 5 current US$ | 0.6298 current US$ | Djibouti |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Djibouti or Senegal?
- Djibouti, at 5.63 current US$ against 5.12 current US$ in Senegal as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Djibouti and Senegal?
- 0.51 current US$, with Djibouti ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Djibouti and Senegal?
- 20 years are reported by both, from 1992 to 2011.
- How do Djibouti and Senegal rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Djibouti ranks 25th and Senegal ranks 27th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.