Eswatini vs Guinea-Bissau: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Eswatini
- Guinea-Bissau
How they compare
Guinea-Bissau currently reports 3.43 current US$ against 3.24 current US$ in Eswatini, a difference of 0.19 current US$.
That makes Guinea-Bissau's figure about 1.1 times Eswatini's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 7 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Eswatini ahead.
Eswatini ranks 37th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 36th of 51 countries.
Guinea-Bissau has averaged higher in every one of the 1 decades both report.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Eswatini or Guinea-Bissau?
- Guinea-Bissau, at 3.43 current US$ against 3.24 current US$ in Eswatini as of 1997.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 0.19 current US$, with Guinea-Bissau ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau?
- 7 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 1997.
- How do Eswatini and Guinea-Bissau rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Eswatini ranks 37th and Guinea-Bissau ranks 36th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.