Ethiopia vs Guinea: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Ethiopia
- Guinea
How they compare
Guinea currently reports 1.03 current US$ against 0.5444 current US$ in Ethiopia, a difference of 0.4856 current US$.
That makes Guinea's figure about 1.9 times Ethiopia's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea ahead.
Ethiopia ranks 50th and Guinea ranks 48th of 51 countries.
Guinea has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Ethiopia | Guinea | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.5 current US$ | 3.3 current US$ | 1.81 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2000s | 0.9231 current US$ | 2.34 current US$ | 1.41 current US$ | Guinea |
| 2010s | 0.5552 current US$ | 1.03 current US$ | 0.4752 current US$ | Guinea |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Ethiopia or Guinea?
- Guinea, at 1.03 current US$ against 0.5444 current US$ in Ethiopia as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Ethiopia and Guinea?
- 0.4856 current US$, with Guinea ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Ethiopia and Guinea?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Ethiopia and Guinea rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Ethiopia ranks 50th and Guinea ranks 48th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.