Gambia vs Rwanda: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Gambia
- Rwanda
How they compare
Rwanda currently reports 1.97 current US$ against 1.24 current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 0.73 current US$.
That makes Rwanda's figure about 1.6 times Gambia's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 12 shared years of data; in 1995 it was Gambia ahead.
Gambia ranks 47th and Rwanda ranks 44th of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Gambia averaged higher in 1 and Rwanda in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Gambia | Rwanda | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 2.92 current US$ | 1.66 current US$ | 1.26 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 1.39 current US$ | 1.9 current US$ | 0.5093 current US$ | Rwanda |
| 2010s | 1.24 current US$ | 1.97 current US$ | 0.7295 current US$ | Rwanda |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Gambia or Rwanda?
- Rwanda, at 1.97 current US$ against 1.24 current US$ in Gambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Gambia and Rwanda?
- 0.73 current US$, with Rwanda ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Gambia and Rwanda?
- 12 years are reported by both, from 1995 to 2011.
- How do Gambia and Rwanda rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Gambia ranks 47th and Rwanda ranks 44th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.