Lesotho vs Niger: Residential monthly telephone subscription
Residential monthly telephone subscription over time
- Lesotho
- Niger
How they compare
Niger currently reports 7.6 current US$ against 6.83 current US$ in Lesotho, a difference of 0.77 current US$.
That makes Niger's figure about 1.1 times Lesotho's.
The two have swapped places 6 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Niger ahead.
Lesotho ranks 16th and Niger ranks 14th of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Lesotho averaged higher in 1 and Niger in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Lesotho | Niger | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 5.18 current US$ | 6 current US$ | 0.8161 current US$ | Niger |
| 2000s | 6.18 current US$ | 5.58 current US$ | 0.6008 current US$ | Lesotho |
| 2010s | 6.83 current US$ | 7.24 current US$ | 0.4067 current US$ | Niger |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential monthly telephone subscription, Lesotho or Niger?
- Niger, at 7.6 current US$ against 6.83 current US$ in Lesotho as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential monthly telephone subscription between Lesotho and Niger?
- 0.77 current US$, with Niger ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Lesotho and Niger?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2010.
- How do Lesotho and Niger rank globally for residential monthly telephone subscription?
- Lesotho ranks 16th and Niger ranks 14th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential monthly telephone subscription (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Monthly subscription refers to the recurring fixed charge for subscribing to the PSTN. The charge should cover the rental of the line, but not the rental of the terminal (e.g., telephone set) where the terminal equipment market is liberalized. Separate charges should be stated where appropriate, for first and subsequent lines. If the rental charge includes any allowance for free or reduced rate call units, this should be indicated. If there are different charges for different exchange areas, the largest urban area should be used and specified in a note. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.