Guinea-Bissau vs Zambia: Residential telephone connection charge
Residential telephone connection charge over time
- Guinea-Bissau
- Zambia
How they compare
Zambia currently reports 50,000 current LCU against 48,000 current LCU in Guinea-Bissau, a difference of 2,000 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 10 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Guinea-Bissau ahead.
Guinea-Bissau ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 10th of 51 countries.
Across the 2 decades both report, Guinea-Bissau averaged higher in 1 and Zambia in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Guinea-Bissau | Zambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 31,922 current LCU | 19,971 current LCU | 11,950 current LCU | Guinea-Bissau |
| 2000s | 48,000 current LCU | 50,000 current LCU | 2,000 current LCU | Zambia |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential telephone connection charge, Guinea-Bissau or Zambia?
- Zambia, at 50,000 current LCU against 48,000 current LCU in Guinea-Bissau as of 2010.
- What is the difference in residential telephone connection charge between Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
- 2,000 current LCU, with Zambia ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Guinea-Bissau and Zambia?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2000.
- How do Guinea-Bissau and Zambia rank globally for residential telephone connection charge?
- Guinea-Bissau ranks 11th and Zambia ranks 10th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation refers to the one time charge involved in applying for basic telephone service for business purposes. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge is generally for the largest urban area unless otherwise noted. This indicator is expressed in national currency.