Sudan vs Zimbabwe: Residential telephone connection charge
Residential telephone connection charge over time
- Sudan
- Zimbabwe
How they compare
Zimbabwe currently reports 23 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Sudan, a difference of 23 current LCU.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 15 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Sudan ahead.
Sudan ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 51 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Sudan averaged higher in 1 and Zimbabwe in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Sudan | Zimbabwe | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 4,106 current LCU | 122.83 current LCU | 3,983 current LCU | Sudan |
| 2000s | 6,500 current LCU | 121,483 current LCU | 114,983 current LCU | Zimbabwe |
| 2010s | 0 current LCU | 23 current LCU | 23 current LCU | Zimbabwe |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential telephone connection charge, Sudan or Zimbabwe?
- Zimbabwe, at 23 current LCU against 0 current LCU in Sudan as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential telephone connection charge between Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 23 current LCU, with Zimbabwe ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Sudan and Zimbabwe?
- 15 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Sudan and Zimbabwe rank globally for residential telephone connection charge?
- Sudan ranks 48th and Zimbabwe ranks 46th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential telephone connection charge (current LCU). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation refers to the one time charge involved in applying for basic telephone service for business purposes. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge is generally for the largest urban area unless otherwise noted. This indicator is expressed in national currency.