Egypt vs Malawi: Residential telephone connection charge
Residential telephone connection charge over time
- Egypt
- Malawi
How they compare
Malawi currently reports 15.63 current US$ against 8.26 current US$ in Egypt, a difference of 7.37 current US$.
That makes Malawi's figure about 1.9 times Egypt's.
The two have swapped places 1 time across 16 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Egypt ahead.
Egypt ranks 43rd and Malawi ranks 40th of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Egypt averaged higher in 2 and Malawi in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Egypt | Malawi | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 132.47 current US$ | 44.51 current US$ | 87.96 current US$ | Egypt |
| 2000s | 92.83 current US$ | 13.49 current US$ | 79.34 current US$ | Egypt |
| 2010s | 8.13 current US$ | 14.78 current US$ | 6.65 current US$ | Malawi |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential telephone connection charge, Egypt or Malawi?
- Malawi, at 15.63 current US$ against 8.26 current US$ in Egypt as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential telephone connection charge between Egypt and Malawi?
- 7.37 current US$, with Malawi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Egypt and Malawi?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2011.
- How do Egypt and Malawi rank globally for residential telephone connection charge?
- Egypt ranks 43rd and Malawi ranks 40th of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential telephone connection charge (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation refers to the one time charge involved in applying for basic telephone service for business purposes. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge is generally for the largest urban area unless otherwise noted. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.