Eswatini vs Gambia: Residential telephone connection charge
Residential telephone connection charge over time
- Eswatini
- Gambia
How they compare
Eswatini currently reports 29.34 current US$ against 28.81 current US$ in Gambia, a difference of 0.53 current US$.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 16 shared years of data; in 1990 it was Gambia ahead.
Eswatini ranks 30th and Gambia ranks 31st of 50 countries.
Across the 3 decades both report, Eswatini averaged higher in 1 and Gambia in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Eswatini | Gambia | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 26.72 current US$ | 64.33 current US$ | 37.61 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2000s | 23.99 current US$ | 42.81 current US$ | 18.82 current US$ | Gambia |
| 2010s | 29.34 current US$ | 28.81 current US$ | 0.5347 current US$ | Eswatini |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher residential telephone connection charge, Eswatini or Gambia?
- Eswatini, at 29.34 current US$ against 28.81 current US$ in Gambia as of 2011.
- What is the difference in residential telephone connection charge between Eswatini and Gambia?
- 0.53 current US$, with Eswatini ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Eswatini and Gambia?
- 16 years are reported by both, from 1990 to 2011.
- How do Eswatini and Gambia rank globally for residential telephone connection charge?
- Eswatini ranks 30th and Gambia ranks 31st of 50 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Residential telephone connection charge (current US$). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Please cite the International Telecommunication Union for third-party use of these data. Installation refers to the one time charge involved in applying for basic telephone service for business purposes. Where there are different charges for different exchange areas, the charge is generally for the largest urban area unless otherwise noted. This indicator is expressed in US dollars.