Burundi vs Sudan: Unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines)
Burundi
0.1%
in 2008
Sudan
0.0%
in 2008
Burundi rank
48th
Sudan rank
50th
Unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines) over time
- Burundi
- Sudan
How they compare
Burundi currently reports 0.1% against 0.0% in Sudan, a difference of 0.1%.
The two have swapped places 4 times across 19 shared years of data; in 1970 it was Burundi ahead.
Burundi ranks 48th and Sudan ranks 50th of 51 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, Burundi averaged higher in 2 and Sudan in 2.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Burundi | Sudan | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1970s | 34.1% | 16.9% | 17.2% | Burundi |
| 1980s | 36.0% | 35.9% | 0.1% | Burundi |
| 1990s | 36.3% | 168.8% | 132.5% | Sudan |
| 2000s | 26.2% | 67.9% | 41.8% | Sudan |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines), Burundi or Sudan?
- Burundi, at 0.1% against 0.0% in Sudan as of 2008.
- What is the difference in unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines) between Burundi and Sudan?
- 0.1%, with Burundi ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Burundi and Sudan?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1970 to 2008.
- How do Burundi and Sudan rank globally for unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines)?
- Burundi ranks 48th and Sudan ranks 50th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines in operation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Unmet demand is unmet applications for connection to the public switched telephone network that have had to be held over owing to a lack of technical facilities (equipment, lines, and the like) divided by the number of main telephone lines in operation.