Congo vs Mozambique: Unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines)
Congo
3.6%
in 1994
Mozambique
4.0%
in 2006
Congo rank
29th
Mozambique rank
28th
Unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines) over time
- Congo
- Mozambique
How they compare
Mozambique currently reports 4.0% against 3.6% in Congo, a difference of 0.4%.
That makes Mozambique's figure about 1.1 times Congo's.
Across all 10 years both countries report, Mozambique has been ahead every year.
Congo ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 28th of 51 countries.
Mozambique has averaged higher in every one of the 2 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Congo | Mozambique | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 23.3% | 71.4% | 48.1% | Mozambique |
| 1990s | 14.7% | 48.6% | 33.9% | Mozambique |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines), Congo or Mozambique?
- Mozambique, at 4.0% against 3.6% in Congo as of 2006.
- What is the difference in unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines) between Congo and Mozambique?
- 0.4%, with Mozambique ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Congo and Mozambique?
- 10 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 1994.
- How do Congo and Mozambique rank globally for unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines)?
- Congo ranks 29th and Mozambique ranks 28th of 51 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- International Telecommunication Union, World Telecommunication Development Report and database, and World Bank estimates, published as Unmet demand (% of waiting list to number main fixed telephone lines in operation). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.
Individual pages
About this data
Unmet demand is unmet applications for connection to the public switched telephone network that have had to be held over owing to a lack of technical facilities (equipment, lines, and the like) divided by the number of main telephone lines in operation.