Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international

Hong Kong, China
13.58 Number
in 2013
Iceland
14.53 Number
in 2013
Hong Kong, China rank
44th
Iceland rank
43rd

Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Iceland
0510152025197919962013

How they compare

Iceland currently reports 14.53 Number against 13.58 Number in Hong Kong, China, a difference of 0.95 Number.

That makes Iceland's figure about 1.1 times Hong Kong, China's.

The two have swapped places 9 times across 33 shared years of data; in 1980 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 44th and Iceland ranks 43rd of 60 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Hong Kong, China averaged higher in 2 and Iceland in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Iceland Difference Ahead
1980s 3.74 Number 0.5511 Number 3.19 Number Hong Kong, China
1990s 10.42 Number 4.41 Number 6.01 Number Hong Kong, China
2000s 13.44 Number 14.12 Number 0.675 Number Iceland
2010s 8.9 Number 11.7 Number 2.8 Number Iceland

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent applications to the epo by priority year by international, Hong Kong, China or Iceland?
Iceland, at 14.53 Number against 13.58 Number in Hong Kong, China as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent applications to the epo by priority year by international between Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
0.95 Number, with Iceland ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Iceland?
33 years are reported by both, from 1980 to 2013.
How do Hong Kong, China and Iceland rank globally for patent applications to the epo by priority year by international?
Hong Kong, China ranks 44th and Iceland ranks 43rd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-applications-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by-international-patent-classification-2/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-applications-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by-international-patent-classification-2/hong-kong-sar-china/iceland/">Hong Kong, China vs Iceland: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1977-2012)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 2,107 data points, 1977–2013
Last refreshed