Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international

Hong Kong, China
13.58 Number
in 2013
Latvia
9.91 Number
in 2013
Hong Kong, China rank
44th
Latvia rank
46th

Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international over time

  • Hong Kong, China
  • Latvia
0510152025197919962013

How they compare

Hong Kong, China currently reports 13.58 Number against 9.91 Number in Latvia, a difference of 3.67 Number.

That makes Hong Kong, China's figure about 1.4 times Latvia's.

The two have swapped places 2 times across 20 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Hong Kong, China ahead.

Hong Kong, China ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 46th of 60 countries.

Hong Kong, China has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Hong Kong, China Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 10.28 Number 1.16 Number 9.12 Number Hong Kong, China
2000s 13.44 Number 4.09 Number 9.35 Number Hong Kong, China
2010s 8.9 Number 6.65 Number 2.25 Number Hong Kong, China

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent applications to the epo by priority year by international, Hong Kong, China or Latvia?
Hong Kong, China, at 13.58 Number against 9.91 Number in Latvia as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent applications to the epo by priority year by international between Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
3.67 Number, with Hong Kong, China ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Hong Kong, China and Latvia?
20 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2013.
How do Hong Kong, China and Latvia rank globally for patent applications to the epo by priority year by international?
Hong Kong, China ranks 44th and Latvia ranks 46th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1977-2012). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 09 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-applications-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by-international-patent-classification-2/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-applications-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by-international-patent-classification-2/hong-kong-sar-china/latvia/">Hong Kong, China vs Latvia: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1977-2012)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 2,107 data points, 1977–2013
Last refreshed