Latvia vs Schleswig-Holstein: Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region
Latvia
1.89
in 2012
Schleswig-Holstein
132.36
in 2012
Latvia rank
27th
Schleswig-Holstein rank
25th
Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region over time
- Latvia
- Schleswig-Holstein
How they compare
Schleswig-Holstein currently reports 132.36 against 1.89 in Latvia, a difference of 130.47.
That makes Schleswig-Holstein's figure about 70.0 times Latvia's.
Across all 19 years both countries report, Schleswig-Holstein has been ahead every year.
Latvia ranks 27th and Schleswig-Holstein ranks 25th of 31 countries.
Schleswig-Holstein has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Latvia | Schleswig-Holstein | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1990s | 1.16 | 74.51 | 73.35 | Schleswig-Holstein |
| 2000s | 4.1 | 117.18 | 113.08 | Schleswig-Holstein |
| 2010s | 5.23 | 131.15 | 125.92 | Schleswig-Holstein |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region, Latvia or Schleswig-Holstein?
- Schleswig-Holstein, at 132.36 against 1.89 in Latvia as of 2012.
- What is the difference in patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region between Latvia and Schleswig-Holstein?
- 130.47, with Schleswig-Holstein ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Latvia and Schleswig-Holstein?
- 19 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2012.
- How do Latvia and Schleswig-Holstein rank globally for patent applications to the epo by priority year by nuts 3 region?
- Latvia ranks 27th and Schleswig-Holstein ranks 25th of 31 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Patent applications to the EPO by priority year by NUTS 3 region, international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1977-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.