Australia vs Belgium: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by

Australia
160.62 Number
in 2013
Belgium
165.34 Number
in 2013
Australia rank
18th
Belgium rank
17th

Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time

  • Australia
  • Belgium
0100200300198319982013

How they compare

Belgium currently reports 165.34 Number against 160.62 Number in Australia, a difference of 4.72 Number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 26 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 18th and Belgium ranks 17th of 60 countries.

Australia has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Belgium Difference Ahead
1980s 23.21 Number 6.21 Number 17 Number Australia
1990s 105.56 Number 64.94 Number 40.62 Number Australia
2000s 245.57 Number 147.77 Number 97.8 Number Australia
2010s 202.2 Number 173.78 Number 28.42 Number Australia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, Australia or Belgium?
Belgium, at 165.34 Number against 160.62 Number in Australia as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between Australia and Belgium?
4.72 Number, with Belgium ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Belgium?
26 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2013.
How do Australia and Belgium rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
Australia ranks 18th and Belgium ranks 17th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Belgium: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 07 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/australia/belgium/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/australia/belgium/">Australia vs Belgium: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 1,698 data points, 1978–2013
Last refreshed