Australia vs Denmark: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by

Australia
160.62 Number
in 2013
Denmark
153.09 Number
in 2013
Australia rank
18th
Denmark rank
19th

Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time

  • Australia
  • Denmark
0100200300198319982013

How they compare

Australia currently reports 160.62 Number against 153.09 Number in Denmark, a difference of 7.53 Number.

The two have swapped places 14 times across 30 shared years of data; in 1983 it was Australia ahead.

Australia ranks 18th and Denmark ranks 19th of 60 countries.

Across the 4 decades both report, Australia averaged higher in 2 and Denmark in 2.

Head to head by decade

Decade Australia Denmark Difference Ahead
1980s 11.91 Number 9.15 Number 2.76 Number Australia
1990s 105.56 Number 114.28 Number 8.72 Number Denmark
2000s 245.57 Number 243.76 Number 1.81 Number Australia
2010s 202.2 Number 202.21 Number 0.0125 Number Denmark

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, Australia or Denmark?
Australia, at 160.62 Number against 153.09 Number in Denmark as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between Australia and Denmark?
7.53 Number, with Australia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Australia and Denmark?
30 years are reported by both, from 1983 to 2013.
How do Australia and Denmark rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
Australia ranks 18th and Denmark ranks 19th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Australia vs Denmark: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 02 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/australia/denmark/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/australia/denmark/">Australia vs Denmark: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 1,698 data points, 1978–2013
Last refreshed