Austria vs New Zealand: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by

Austria
122.3 Number
in 2013
New Zealand
63.48 Number
in 2013
Austria rank
22nd
New Zealand rank
24th

Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time

  • Austria
  • New Zealand
050100150198419982013

How they compare

Austria currently reports 122.3 Number against 63.48 Number in New Zealand, a difference of 58.82 Number.

That makes Austria's figure about 1.9 times New Zealand's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Austria has been ahead every year.

Austria ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 24th of 60 countries.

Austria has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Austria New Zealand Difference Ahead
1980s 9.21 Number 0.165 Number 9.05 Number Austria
1990s 49.56 Number 18.66 Number 30.91 Number Austria
2000s 116.82 Number 52.7 Number 64.12 Number Austria
2010s 148.3 Number 59.69 Number 88.61 Number Austria

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, Austria or New Zealand?
Austria, at 122.3 Number against 63.48 Number in New Zealand as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between Austria and New Zealand?
58.82 Number, with Austria ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Austria and New Zealand?
26 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2013.
How do Austria and New Zealand rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
Austria ranks 22nd and New Zealand ranks 24th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Austria vs New Zealand: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 12 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/austria/new-zealand/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/austria/new-zealand/">Austria vs New Zealand: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 1,698 data points, 1978–2013
Last refreshed