China except Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by

China except Hong Kong
386.95 Number
in 2013
Netherlands
489.73 Number
in 2013
China except Hong Kong rank
6th
Netherlands rank
8th

Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time

  • China except Hong Kong
  • Netherlands
0200400600800198419982013

How they compare

Netherlands currently reports 489.73 Number against 386.95 Number in China except Hong Kong, a difference of 102.78 Number.

That makes Netherlands's figure about 1.3 times China except Hong Kong's.

Across all 26 years both countries report, Netherlands has been ahead every year.

China except Hong Kong ranks 6th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 7 regions.

Netherlands has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade China except Hong Kong Netherlands Difference Ahead
1980s 0.115 Number 9.7 Number 9.58 Number Netherlands
1990s 9.89 Number 126.88 Number 116.99 Number Netherlands
2000s 142.91 Number 409.13 Number 266.22 Number Netherlands
2010s 371.38 Number 591.7 Number 220.32 Number Netherlands

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, China except Hong Kong or Netherlands?
Netherlands, at 489.73 Number against 386.95 Number in China except Hong Kong as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between China except Hong Kong and Netherlands?
102.78 Number, with Netherlands ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for China except Hong Kong and Netherlands?
26 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2013.
How do China except Hong Kong and Netherlands rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
China except Hong Kong ranks 6th and Netherlands ranks 8th of 7 regions.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

China except Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 11 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/china-except-hong-kong/netherlands/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/china-except-hong-kong/netherlands/">China except Hong Kong vs Netherlands: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 1,698 data points, 1978–2013
Last refreshed