Cyprus vs Latvia: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by

Cyprus
0.55 Number
in 2013
Latvia
1.44 Number
in 2013
Cyprus rank
56th
Latvia rank
53rd

Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time

  • Cyprus
  • Latvia
0246199120022013

How they compare

Latvia currently reports 1.44 Number against 0.55 Number in Cyprus, a difference of 0.89 Number.

That makes Latvia's figure about 2.6 times Cyprus's.

The two have swapped places 7 times across 18 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Cyprus ahead.

Cyprus ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 53rd of 60 countries.

Latvia has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Cyprus Latvia Difference Ahead
1990s 0.768 Number 0.9 Number 0.132 Number Latvia
2000s 1.85 Number 3.12 Number 1.27 Number Latvia
2010s 1.54 Number 2.04 Number 0.49 Number Latvia

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, Cyprus or Latvia?
Latvia, at 1.44 Number against 0.55 Number in Cyprus as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between Cyprus and Latvia?
0.89 Number, with Latvia ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Cyprus and Latvia?
18 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2013.
How do Cyprus and Latvia rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
Cyprus ranks 56th and Latvia ranks 53rd of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Cyprus vs Latvia: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 05 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/cyprus/latvia/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/cyprus/latvia/">Cyprus vs Latvia: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 1,698 data points, 1978–2013
Last refreshed