Finland vs New Zealand: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by
Finland
67.88 Number
in 2013
New Zealand
63.48 Number
in 2013
Finland rank
23rd
New Zealand rank
24th
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time
- Finland
- New Zealand
How they compare
Finland currently reports 67.88 Number against 63.48 Number in New Zealand, a difference of 4.4 Number.
That makes Finland's figure about 1.1 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 2 times across 26 shared years of data; in 1988 it was Finland ahead.
Finland ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 24th of 60 countries.
Finland has averaged higher in every one of the 4 decades both report.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | Finland | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 9.84 Number | 0.165 Number | 9.68 Number | Finland |
| 1990s | 54.61 Number | 18.66 Number | 35.95 Number | Finland |
| 2000s | 73.22 Number | 52.7 Number | 20.53 Number | Finland |
| 2010s | 72.27 Number | 59.69 Number | 12.58 Number | Finland |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, Finland or New Zealand?
- Finland, at 67.88 Number against 63.48 Number in New Zealand as of 2013.
- What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between Finland and New Zealand?
- 4.4 Number, with Finland ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for Finland and New Zealand?
- 26 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2013.
- How do Finland and New Zealand rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
- Finland ranks 23rd and New Zealand ranks 24th of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.