India vs New Zealand: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by
India
125.21 Number
in 2013
New Zealand
63.48 Number
in 2013
India rank
21st
New Zealand rank
24th
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time
- India
- New Zealand
How they compare
India currently reports 125.21 Number against 63.48 Number in New Zealand, a difference of 61.73 Number.
That makes India's figure about 2.0 times New Zealand's.
The two have swapped places 3 times across 25 shared years of data; in 1988 it was New Zealand ahead.
India ranks 21st and New Zealand ranks 24th of 60 countries.
Across the 4 decades both report, India averaged higher in 3 and New Zealand in 1.
Head to head by decade
| Decade | India | New Zealand | Difference | Ahead |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1980s | 0.545 Number | 0.165 Number | 0.38 Number | India |
| 1990s | 10.18 Number | 20.05 Number | 9.87 Number | New Zealand |
| 2000s | 130.8 Number | 52.7 Number | 78.11 Number | India |
| 2010s | 171.24 Number | 59.69 Number | 111.55 Number | India |
Averages of every year both report within each decade.
Frequently asked questions
- Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, India or New Zealand?
- India, at 125.21 Number against 63.48 Number in New Zealand as of 2013.
- What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between India and New Zealand?
- 61.73 Number, with India ahead.
- How many years of comparable data are there for India and New Zealand?
- 25 years are reported by both, from 1988 to 2013.
- How do India and New Zealand rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
- India ranks 21st and New Zealand ranks 24th of 60 countries.
- Where does this data come from?
- Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.