Russian Federation vs Chinese Taipei: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by

Russian Federation
33.34 Number
in 2013
Chinese Taipei
34.36 Number
in 2013
Russian Federation rank
30th
Chinese Taipei rank
29th

Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by over time

  • Russian Federation
  • Chinese Taipei
020406080198920012013

How they compare

Chinese Taipei currently reports 34.36 Number against 33.34 Number in Russian Federation, a difference of 1.02 Number.

The two have swapped places 1 time across 23 shared years of data; in 1991 it was Russian Federation ahead.

Russian Federation ranks 30th and Chinese Taipei ranks 29th of 60 countries.

Russian Federation has averaged higher in every one of the 3 decades both report.

Head to head by decade

Decade Russian Federation Chinese Taipei Difference Ahead
1990s 22.25 Number 2.88 Number 19.37 Number Russian Federation
2000s 48.33 Number 13.03 Number 35.3 Number Russian Federation
2010s 60.83 Number 37.74 Number 23.09 Number Russian Federation

Averages of every year both report within each decade.

Frequently asked questions

Which has higher patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by, Russian Federation or Chinese Taipei?
Chinese Taipei, at 34.36 Number against 33.34 Number in Russian Federation as of 2013.
What is the difference in patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by between Russian Federation and Chinese Taipei?
1.02 Number, with Chinese Taipei ahead.
How many years of comparable data are there for Russian Federation and Chinese Taipei?
23 years are reported by both, from 1991 to 2013.
How do Russian Federation and Chinese Taipei rank globally for patent cooperation treaty (pct) applications designated to the epo by?
Russian Federation ranks 30th and Chinese Taipei ranks 29th of 60 countries.
Where does this data come from?
Eurostat, published as Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013). Statizoid refreshes it automatically from the source and publishes the full history for both places.

Individual pages

Share, cite or embed this page

Cite this page

Russian Federation vs Chinese Taipei: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by. Statizoid, drawing on Eurostat. Retrieved 10 September 2026, from https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/russian-federation/taiwan/

Embed or link this data

Paste this into a page to link back to these figures. The data itself is free to reuse under CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat); please keep the attribution.

<a href="https://science-tech.statizoid.com/compare/patent-cooperation-treaty-pct-applications-designated-to-the-epo-by-priority-year-by/russian-federation/taiwan/">Russian Federation vs Chinese Taipei: Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by</a> — Statizoid

About this data

Indicator
Patent cooperation treaty (PCT) applications designated to the EPO by priority year by international patent classification (IPC) sections and classes (1978-2013)
Unit
Number
Source
Eurostat
Licence
CC BY 4.0 (Eurostat)
Coverage
67 places, 1,698 data points, 1978–2013
Last refreshed